首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of Sustainable Development 2008 Report of PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Based on Indicator Protocols of Global Reporting Initiative and Key Performance Indicators of Cement Sustainability Initiative
【2h】

Analysis of Sustainable Development 2008 Report of PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk Based on Indicator Protocols of Global Reporting Initiative and Key Performance Indicators of Cement Sustainability Initiative

机译:基于全球报告倡议的指标协议和水泥可持续性倡议的关键绩效指标的PT Holcim Indonesia Tbk可持续发展2008年报告分析

摘要

The existence of company will give both good impact and bad impact. For the good impact, company can be a tool to help society to fulfill their necessity. In twentieth century, myriad of industrial company give bad impact on their existence. They don\u27t care with natural resources they use to provide something to consumers or don\u27t consider employee, environment, consumers, or community as significant thing to sustain their business. The companies just take natural resources as many as they need to process for their economic activities without doing anything to keep or make renewable natural resources. As for environment, there are many environmental destruction happening since the companies neglect their surroundings. They only care for their own benefit. As a result, from the economic activities, companies provide externalities (Gray et al, 1996, pg. 1) - consequences of economic activity which are not reflected the cost borne by the individual or organization enjoying the benefit of the activity) as impact of their activities. Many externalities make society affected by the impact. Society claims to get the companies contribute to surrounding environment where the companies are established. Many cases show that the existence of company can make environmental destruction. For example: PT. Lapindo Brantas on their case of hot mud. The other cases are Newmont Minahasa Raya on Buyat Bay and PT. Freeport on Papua.
机译:公司的存在会带来好影响和坏影响。为了产生良好的影响,公司可以成为帮助社会满足其需要的工具。在20世纪,无数的工业公司对其生存产生了不良影响。他们不在乎用于为消费者提供某些东西的自然资源,也没有将员工,环境,消费者或社区视为维持其业务的重要事物。这些公司只是为进行经济活动而需要处理的自然资源,而没有采取任何措施来保留或制造可再生自然资源。关于环境,由于公司忽视了周围环境,因此发生了许多环境破坏事件。他们只关心自己的利益。结果,公司从经济活动中提供了外部性(Gray等人,1996年,第1页)-经济活动的后果,未反映个人或组织从享受该项活动的利益中承担的成本),他们的活动。许多外部因素使社会受到影响。社会声称要让公司为公司成立的周围环境做出贡献。许多情况表明,公司的存在会破坏环境。例如:PT。 Lapindo Brantas遇上了热泥。其他案例是布亚特湾和PT的Newmont Minahasa Raya。巴布亚自由港。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sukoharsono, Eko Ganis;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 EN
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号